Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 05:15

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Space humbles the SEAL-doctor-astronaut | On the ISS this week June 9-13, 2025 - Space
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
'We've got a new mystery on our hands': Titan's weird wobble just got even stranger - Space
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
We Asked Dietitians Their Favorite High- Protein Snacks—Here's The Top 9 - health.com
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
iOS 26 Includes These Five Smaller Features You Might Have Missed - MacRumors
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Renault CEO and architect of Alpine F1 project stepping down - The Race
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Is it recommended to leave a note in a lost wallet asking for it to be returned?